I have been using an h2s for two years and have been very happy with its performance. In my main TV viewing room, I've had a Humax box for four years. The Humax went faulty last November and cost 75 UK pounds to fix. It has now gone faulty again and rather than spending another 75 plus on a fix I am thinking of getting another Zgemma to replace it. I would be happy with another h2s but since things have been moving on I have been looking at H9s - this is where my confusion comes in.
I could go for a second-hand h2s for 40 pounds but am tempted by a new H9 but do not know if the cheaper H9 twin will do all my h2s does (It only has one satellite cable socket). I also like the idea of a plugin hard drive on the H9.2s. I have no need for 4k atm but I like the sound of more processing power/speed.
I've read posts reporting that there have been lots of trouble with the H9s but not what sort of troubles. I have also read ones from people that are very happy with them.
I could go for a second-hand h2s for 40 pounds but am tempted by a new H9 but do not know if the cheaper H9 twin will do all my h2s does (It only has one satellite cable socket). I also like the idea of a plugin hard drive on the H9.2s. I have no need for 4k atm but I like the sound of more processing power/speed.
I've read posts reporting that there have been lots of trouble with the H9s but not what sort of troubles. I have also read ones from people that are very happy with them.