What's new
By:
Filters

Windows 7 more malware-resistant than XP/Vista

ferguj1

ferguj1

Super Duper Modulator
Staff member
By Adrian Kingsley-Hughes | May 15, 2011, 6:01am PDT

If you’re a Windows user that’s holding onto your Vista or XP installation, then this recent security report from Microsoft might make you think about switching to Windows 7.
The report goes on for nearly ninety pages, but I think that this chart of quarterly infection rates for 2010 says it all really:

This data has been normalized so that it represents infections per thousand systems (in other words, the popularity of XP doesn’t skew the results towards XP).
Windows XP SP3 32-bit has an infection rate of 15.9 per thousand systems, while Windows Vista SP2 32-bit has half this infection rate, 7.5 per thousand. Windows 7 32-bit nearly halves this again to 3.8 per thousand, while Windows 7 64-bit managed to get the infection rate per thousand down to 2.5.
Why is 64-bit Windows more secure? Microsoft offers up two possible suggestions:

  • That 64-bit users are more savvy than 32-bit users (more true in 2010 than it is in 2011)
  • Kernel Patch Protection helps to prevent unauthorized modifications, hobbling a lot fo malware
There are other interesting nuggets in the report. Take this chart of exploit attempts, showing how hackers have leapt on Java:

Here’s another interesting chart, showing how PDF exploits have fallen dramatically:

So, Windows 7 is safer than Vista, and much safer than XP … does this make you want to upgrade?
 
Ahh, most people will have the problem of having an old machine that would be alot more stable on XP than any other OS. I do notice that my XP system can catch viruses just like that, almost as if my system just welcomes them as soon as they knock.

Think it'd be better purchasing a new laptop. :)
 
Exactly Dan and the market is growing faster than most people can afford to keep up with these days.
Telling someone to upgrade to stay safe is just not an option for alot of people, they just have to get a bit more savvy themselves in what to watch out for!
 
I think I would trust an independant report much better, not that I am saying Microsoft want to get any richer you understand lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top