Techkings

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Man City looking at 1 year ban from champions league

bazcfc1

VIP Member
Forum Supporter
Manchester City could face a Uefa ban from Champions League for a season
By Dan RoanBBC sports editor
Share this with Email Share this with Facebook Share this with Twitter Share this with Whatsapp
Image copyrightAFP
Manchester City

Image captionManchester City won the Premier League for the fourth time in eight seasons on Sunday
Uefa investigators want Manchester City to be banned from the Champions League for a season if they are found guilty of breaking financial rules.
However, according to one well-placed source, a final decision is yet to be made by chief investigator Yves Leterme.
The former Belgian prime minister, chairman of the investigatory panel of Uefa's independent financial control board, is set to make a recommendation this week.
With no vote in such cases, the final say lies with him but several of his colleagues are understood to have firmly expressed the view at a recent meeting that a season-long ban would be a suitable punishment if City are found guilty.
Image copyrightAFP
Manchester City

Image captionManchester City lost to Tottenham in the Champions League quarter-finals this season and have never got past the semi-finalsWhat are City alleged to have done?
Leterme and his team have been looking at evidence first uncovered in a series of leaks published by the German newspaper Der Spiegel last year.
The reports alleged that Manchester City had broken Financial Fair Play regulations by inflating the value of a multimillion-pound sponsorship deal. City were fined £49m in 2014 for a previous breach of regulations.
The Premier League champions denied any wrongdoing, and Uefa said it could not comment on an ongoing investigation, butaccording to the New York Times, investigators now want rules upheld and City punished with a ban.
Uefa's adjudicatory chamber would have to decide whether it agreed with any recommendation from Leterme - expected in the next 48 hours - although it is unlikely to apply to next season's competition because City could appeal, and even take their case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
But it would still be a major blow for a club desperate to win Europe's most prestigious club competition for the first time, and who could also soon face a transfer ban, with the FA, Premier League and Fifa also currently investigating City over their signing of youth players.
A statement from Manchester City said: "Manchester City FC is fully cooperating in good faith with the CFCB IC's [Club Financial Control Body Investigatory Chamber] ongoing investigation.
"In doing so the club is reliant on both the CFCB IC's independence and commitment to due process; and on Uefa's commitment of the 7 March that it 'will make no further comment on the matter while the investigation is ongoing'.
"The New York Times report citing 'people familiar with the case' is therefore extremely concerning.
"The implications are that either Manchester City's good faith in the CFCB IC is misplaced or the CFCB IC process is being misrepresented by individuals intent on damaging the club's reputation and its commercial interests. Or both.
"Manchester City's published accounts are full and complete and a matter of legal and regulatory record. The accusation of financial irregularities are entirely false, and comprehensive proof of this fact has been provided to the CFCB IC."
What are the FFP rules?
Financial Fair Play was introduced by Uefa to prevent clubs in its competitions from spending beyond their means and stamp out what its then president Michel Platini called "financial doping" within football.
Under the rules, financial losses are limited and clubs are also obliged to meet all their transfer and employee payment commitments at all times.
Clubs need to balance football-related expenditure - transfers and wages - with television and ticket income, plus revenues raised by their commercial departments. Money spent on stadiums, training facilities, youth development or community projects is exempt.
The Club Financial Control Body, set up by Uefa, has the ultimate sanction of banning clubs from Uefa competitions, with other potential punishments including warnings, fines, withholding prize money, transfer bans, points deductions, a ban on registration of new players and a restriction on the number of players who can be registered for Uefa competitions.
Has anyone been punished before?
In 2014, Qatar-owned Paris St-Germain received a similar financial punishment to the one City received.
PSG were deemed to have breached FFP ruleswhen the CFCB decided their back-dated £167m sponsorship contract with the Qatar Tourism Authority, which wiped out their losses, had an unfair value.
That meant the French side exceeded allowed financial losses by a wide margin when, under FFP rules, clubs were limited to losses of £37m over the previous two years.
They received a fine, a spending cap and were only allowed to register 21 players for the Champions League for a season.
PSG also remain under investigation for their 2017-18 finances when they signed Neymar from Barcelona for a world record £222m euros (£200m) and Kylian Mbappe from Monaco, initially on loan, for 180m euros (£165.7m).
 

hedges2016

TK Veteran
This is a yearly thing now with city.
And all because city will dominate English football for a very long time, city don't put a price on players they want so if they want a player then they have no choice but to pay it, and if we can win the champions League then it's a bonus. League will always be more important than the champions League will ever be.
Just jealousy - trying to bring down the mighty CITY!!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

wheelo

Admin
Staff member
Forum Supporter
Wouldn't bother me in the slightest, imagine 15 or so games a season less to play? The domestic dominance would be epic..
It's a corrupt organisation trying to look out for the old boys as they cant keep up on or off the pitch.
City have no debt, unlike others, are in the bottom 5 for the gross spending on players last season, have an owner who has a money tree and has bettered east Manchester with jobs and housing, if he wants to spend - let him, but this wouldn't be fair on the others - boo hoo.
Didnt make a difference when United were spending their way into shed loads of debt, only now their dominance is well and truly over.
 

Toddy2

TK Veteran
Forum Supporter
Wouldn't bother me in the slightest, imagine 15 or so games a season less to play? The domestic dominance would be epic..
It's a corrupt organisation trying to look out for the old boys as they cant keep up on or off the pitch.
City have no debt, unlike others, are in the bottom 5 for the gross spending on players last season, have an owner who has a money tree and has bettered east Manchester with jobs and housing, if he wants to spend - let him, but this wouldn't be fair on the others - boo hoo.
Didnt make a difference when United were spending their way into shed loads of debt, only now their dominance is well and truly over.
I'm a foxes fan and I think I would have closed him down before that fluky goal!!!
 

Toddy2

TK Veteran
Forum Supporter
It's alright- Agent Kasper would still have let it go!
Yeah I have studied the footage and I think your right, he did let it go in!!
I'm hoping you get a transfer embargo as I don't want the rest of our good players keeping Marez company on the bench next season!!
Glad you have a sense of humour!! A lot on here haven't!!!
 
Top